Garegin Tumanyan - New interpretation of cultural belonging and dating of a group of ancient sepulchres in Armenia
13 Pages | 150-163 | DOI: Doi:10.54503/0135-0536-2024.2-150 | Revceived on: 2024-05-15 | Reviewed on: 2024-06-28 | Accepted for printing on: 2024-07-10
Published in: 2024 N 2 (226) / Archaeology
From the discussion of the issues related to cultural belonging and dating of a number of sepulchres attributed to Early Iron Age of Armenia, one could conclude that these issues need urgent solution. The widespread practice of looking for parallels of separate items when dating sepulchral complex is unpromising. In the best scenario, this approach can enable to identify the time interval of the formation of the given sepulchral complex, but cannot reveal its cultural belonging.
Keywordssepulchre Cimmerian Early Iron Age culture parallels simultaneous dating warrior rider related material bit.
Ashot Sargsyan - On the issue of the bases for dating the “History of Armenia” by Agathangelos
21 Pages | 3-24 | DOI: DOI: 10.54503/0135-0536-2025.3-3 | Revceived on: 2025-06-11 | Reviewed on: 2025-06-16 | Accepted for printing on: 2025-11-17
Published in: 2025 N 3 (230) / History
When determining the time of creation of medieval historiographical monu¬ments, the authors’ own evidence is of primary importance. On this basis, “History of Armenia” by Agathangelos, since the 5th century, has been traditionally considered the first Armenian historiographical work and was dated back to the 4th century. However, the evidence of historians sometimes does not correspond to the reality.
KeywordsAgathangelos “History of Armenia” historiography political agen¬da dating of a monument political motivation Gregory the Illuminator Khorenatsi Koryun “Golden Age”
